Over 25 Years Serving Los Angeles County
(818) 291-6217

Trust Litigation vs Probate Litigation California: Key Differences

Rozsa GyeneNovember 2, 202510 min read

Trust Litigation vs Probate Litigation California: Key Differences

Many people assume contesting a trust is similar to contesting a will. While both involve challenging estate planning documents, trust litigation and probate litigation in California have significant differences in procedure, venue, timing, and difficulty. Understanding these distinctions is critical for anyone considering a challenge.

This guide explains the key differences between trust and probate litigation in California and strategic implications for each.

Fundamental Difference

Probate Litigation

What it is: Contesting a will that must go through probate court

Process:

  • Will filed with probate court
  • Executor petitions for probate
  • Contestants file objections
  • Probate judge presides
  • Public process

Trust Litigation

What it is: Contesting a trust (typically revocable living trust) that avoids probate

Process:

  • Trust administered privately (usually)
  • Contestant files petition in probate court
  • Litigation initiated by contestant
  • Probate judge presides (but trust not "in probate")
  • More private initially

Venue Differences

Probate Litigation Venue

Where to file:

  • Probate must be filed in county where decedent resided
  • Cannot choose venue
  • Fixed by residence

Example: Decedent lived in Los Angeles County → Will must be probated there

Trust Litigation Venue

More flexibility:

  • County where settlor resided at death, OR
  • County where trust is being administered, OR
  • County where trustee resides

Strategic choice possible

Example:

  • Settlor lived in Los Angeles
  • Trustee lives in Orange County
  • Trust being administered in San Diego
  • Contestant can choose among these venues

Why this matters:

  • Some judges more experienced with trust disputes
  • Convenience for parties/witnesses
  • Local court culture differences

Standing to Contest

Will Contest Standing

Who can contest:

  • Heirs at law (would inherit under intestacy)
  • Named beneficiaries in current will
  • Named beneficiaries in prior will
  • Creditors of estate

Broad standing - Many people have interest

Trust Contest Standing

Who can contest:

  • Beneficiaries of contested trust
  • Beneficiaries of prior trust
  • Heirs at law (if trust invalid, intestacy applies)

Similar but narrower - Must show interest

Key difference: Probate is public proceeding so anyone with standing can easily participate. Trust administration is private so contestants may not know trust exists.

Statute of Limitations

Will Contest Deadline

California Probate Code §8226:

  • 120 days from admission of will to probate
  • Starts when will formally admitted by court
  • Published notice triggers deadline

Deadline certain and publicized

Trust Contest Deadline

California Probate Code §16061.8:

  • 120 days from receiving notice trust became irrevocable
  • Starts when trustee sends proper notice
  • No public notice requirement

Problems:

  • Trustee may not send notice
  • Beneficiaries may not know trust exists
  • Deadline may never start if no notice
  • Can challenge years later if never notified

Advantage for trust contestants: Longer window if trustee doesn't comply with notice requirements

Discovery Differences

Probate Litigation Discovery

More limited initially:

  • Will filed with court (public record)
  • Petition for probate includes basic information
  • Some information automatically public

Later discovery similar to trust litigation

Trust Litigation Discovery

More extensive often needed:

  • Trust not public unless filed with court
  • Must discover trust terms through formal discovery
  • May need to compel trustee to provide documents
  • More initial work to understand situation

Strategic: Trust beneficiaries may not have seen trust until litigation starts

Burden of Proof

Will Contest Burden

Contestant must prove:

  • Grounds for invalidity (capacity, undue influence, fraud, etc.)
  • By clear and convincing evidence

Presumption of validity once will admitted to probate

Trust Contest Burden

Same standard:

  • Contestant must prove grounds
  • Clear and convincing evidence required
  • Presumption of validity

No significant difference in burden

Common Grounds

Will Contest Grounds

  1. Lack of testamentary capacity
  2. Undue influence
  3. Fraud
  4. Duress
  5. Improper execution
  6. Revocation

Same grounds as trust contests

Trust Contest Grounds

  1. Lack of capacity
  2. Undue influence
  3. Fraud
  4. Duress
  5. Improper execution (rare)
  6. Revocation

Identical substantive law for most grounds

Which Is Harder to Contest?

Factors Making Trust Contests Easier

1. Notice Issues

  • May have more time if trustee didn't send notice
  • Deadline may never start
  • Can challenge years later

2. Less Public Process

  • Trust administration private initially
  • Can file petition before trust widely known
  • Less public pressure

3. Venue Selection

  • Can sometimes choose favorable venue
  • Shop for experienced judge

Factors Making Trust Contests Harder

1. Finding Out About Trust

  • No automatic public filing
  • May not know trust exists
  • No published notice
  • Must rely on trustee to disclose

2. Getting Trust Document

  • Must request from trustee
  • May face resistance
  • Need formal petition if refused
  • Takes time to obtain

3. Evidence Collection

  • Trust administration more private
  • Records may be harder to obtain
  • Less court oversight during administration

4. Proving Undue Influence

  • Often alleging influence over long period
  • More gradual changes to trust (multiple amendments)
  • Harder to pinpoint exact moment of influence

Factors Making Probate Contests Easier

1. Automatic Public Filing

  • Will filed with court
  • Public notice published
  • Everyone can see will exists
  • Terms become public

2. Court Supervision

  • Probate court oversees process
  • More transparency
  • Regular court hearings

Factors Making Probate Contests Harder

1. Strict Deadline

  • 120 days certain and short
  • Publicized so no excuse for missing
  • Must act quickly

2. Limited Venue

  • No choice of venue
  • Stuck with decedent's residence county

3. Public Process

  • Everything on public record
  • Family conflict exposed
  • More publicity

Cost Comparison

Probate Litigation Costs

Typical attorney fees:

  • Through contest: $50,000-$150,000
  • Complex cases: $150,000-$300,000+

Other costs:

  • Expert witnesses: $20,000-$50,000
  • Court fees: $1,000-$3,000
  • Depositions: $5,000-$15,000

Trust Litigation Costs

Similar range:

  • Through trial: $75,000-$200,000
  • Complex cases: $200,000-$500,000+

Often higher because:

  • More initial discovery needed
  • May need petition just to get trust document
  • Private administration means more investigation

Fee Recovery

Both types:

  • Prevailing party may recover fees
  • Trust/estate typically pays reasonable defense costs
  • Losing contestant may not recover fees

Strategic Considerations

When You Have a Choice

If decedent had both will and trust:

Contest trust if:

  • Trust terms worse than will
  • Trust easier to prove invalid
  • Venue selection advantages
  • Notice wasn't properly given
  • Want more time

Contest will if:

  • Will terms worse than trust
  • Will clearly invalid
  • Already in probate court
  • Deadline approaching

No-Contest Clauses

Apply to both:

  • Will and trust can have no-contest clauses
  • Both enforceable in California (with probable cause exception)
  • Same risk in either contest

No advantage to one over other regarding no-contest clauses

Simultaneous Will and Trust

Common Scenario

Pour-over will with trust:

  • Will leaves everything to trust
  • Trust contains actual distributions
  • Will goes through probate
  • Trust receives assets

If contest both:

  • Will contest in probate court
  • Trust contest separate petition
  • May be consolidated
  • Same or different grounds possible

Coordinated Strategy

Often necessary to contest both:

  • Invalid trust → Assets go to will beneficiaries
  • Invalid will → Assets go to intestacy or trust
  • May need to challenge both to succeed

Heirs vs. Trust Beneficiaries

Different Interests

In probate:

  • Heirs may contest to invalidate will
  • Want intestacy to apply

In trust litigation:

  • Trust beneficiaries contest to invalidate trust
  • Want prior trust or intestacy

Sometimes same people, sometimes not

Strategic: May benefit from trust contest but not will contest (or vice versa)

Timeline Comparison

Probate Contest Timeline

  • Will filed: Day 1
  • 120-day contest period begins
  • Contest filed by Day 120
  • Discovery: 6-12 months
  • Trial: 12-24 months from filing
  • Total: 18-30 months

Trust Contest Timeline

  • Notice received: Day 1 (or whenever)
  • 120-day period begins (if proper notice)
  • Contest filed by Day 120
  • Discovery: 6-12 months
  • Mediation: Often required
  • Trial: 12-24 months from filing
  • Total: 18-30 months (similar)

Timelines comparable once litigation starts

Settlement Rates

Probate Contests

Settlement rate: 60-70% settle before trial

Settlement timing: Often after discovery, before trial

Trust Contests

Settlement rate: 70-80% settle before trial

Higher settlement rate because:

  • Mediation often court-ordered
  • More privacy incentive
  • Family dynamics (trust typically for family)
  • Costs of litigation

Practical Differences Summary

Factor Probate Litigation Trust Litigation
Venue Fixed (decedent's county) Multiple options
Public filing Required Not initially
Notice Published Private (trustee sends)
Deadline Certain May be extended if no notice
Access to document Automatic (filed with court) Must request from trustee
Discovery Standard Often more extensive
Privacy Public process More private initially
Court supervision Ongoing Limited (unless petition filed)
Settlement rate 60-70% 70-80%

Conclusion

While trust and probate litigation share many similarities (grounds, burden of proof, costs), they differ significantly in procedure, venue, and practical considerations. Trust litigation offers more venue flexibility and potentially more time, but requires more initial work to discover trust terms. Probate litigation is more transparent but has stricter deadlines.

Key takeaways:

  • Trust contests: More venue options, notice issues favor contestants, more private
  • Probate contests: Public process, strict deadlines, automatic filing
  • Similar costs, timelines, and substantive law
  • Trust contests have higher settlement rates
  • Consider which document to contest based on strategic advantages

If you're considering contesting either a will or trust, consult an experienced litigation attorney to determine the best strategy for your situation.

Related Articles

Learn more about trust and probate litigation:

Need Help With Estate Litigation?

Whether you're facing trust litigation or probate litigation, our experienced attorneys handle both types of estate contests throughout California. We can evaluate your case and advise on the best approach.

Contact us for a confidential consultation about your estate litigation matter.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Estate litigation strategy is highly fact-specific. Consult with a qualified California estate litigation attorney about your specific situation.

Tags:#trust litigation#probate litigation#will contest#California estate litigation
Share:

Written by Rozsa Gyene, Esq.
California State Bar #208356 | 25+ Years Probate & Estate Experience
Last Updated: November 28, 2025

Related Articles